indistinguishable from Maxim and all those other frat mags (and congrats on finally putting up an Asian girl). Not stylish, creative or experimental or particularly sexy. How many times can you put Pamela Anderson on the cover? (and congrats for finally giving the spot-light to a black girl) 00's are just more of the same. The trailer hair, the thick, necrophilic make-up, the neon, animal printed, garish design patterns - literally, everything sucks. By the time of my birth year (late Nov.) the magazine starts to slow down, getting progressively more 80's-ish. Not only are they clever and experimental, like the 60s covers, but they have the best looking girls of any decade, and they were far more risque than any decade before or after. Impressions: I noticed that the issues from the 60's lacked, well, women, but they were stylish and clever.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |